Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 301A
Multireels
34.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight252g / 8.89oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size301
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/285. 0.30/235, 0.40/40 lb/yds:12/230, 14/180

Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT
Spinning
60.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.87 out of 10
Ergonomics6.03 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €42.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 301A, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and gear ratio (5.2:1). While Shimano Cardiff 301A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 301A and Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT?
Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa BG 6500X
