Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 301A
Multireels
34.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight252g / 8.89oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size301
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/285. 0.30/235, 0.40/40 lb/yds:12/230, 14/180

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
87.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 301A, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.2:1) and maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). While Shimano Cardiff 301A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 301A and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750
