Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 301A
Multireels
34.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight252g / 8.89oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size301
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/285. 0.30/235, 0.40/40 lb/yds:12/230, 14/180

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
43.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQC 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100
Conclusion
Both Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X and Shimano Cardiff 301A score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score, and line retrieve per crankdurability. If you must choose between them, Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X offers a slight edge in gear ratio, while Shimano Cardiff 301A may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 301A and Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750?
Shimano Cardiff 301A
- A 7 out of 10 (4 A-RB + 1 RB) ball bearing gives a smooth performance across most typical fishing situations
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Similar comparisons

Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX
