Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 301A

Multireels

34.80 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classMedium

Durability3.69 out of 10

Ergonomics6.38 out of 10

Gear ratio5.8:1

Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs

Weight252g / 8.89oz

Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch

Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelMultireels
Price range~ €88.60
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size301
Handle typeDouble handle
Drag typeStar drag
Handle orientationLeft
Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/285. 0.30/235, 0.40/40 lb/yds:12/230, 14/180

Delphin ANTIGRAVITY

Spinning

46.90 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classMedium

Durability3.72 out of 10

Ergonomics6.27 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag0lbs

Weight219g / 7.73oz

Line retireve per crank0 inch

Ball bearings10+1

Technical Specifications

BrandDELPHIN
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €94.95
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size3000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/290

Conclusion

Both Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X and Shimano Cardiff 301A score below average overall, indicating some compromises in durability, total score and line retrieve per crankmaximum drag. If you must choose between them, Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X offers a slight edge in gear ratio, while Shimano Cardiff 301A may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.