Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Delphin SHARX 6000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 301A
Multireels
34.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight252g / 8.89oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size301
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/285. 0.30/235, 0.40/40 lb/yds:12/230, 14/180

Delphin SHARX
Spinning
44.10 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag-
Weight454g / 16.01oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €75.95
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/352
Conclusion
Both Delphin SHARX 6000X and Shimano Cardiff 301A score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score, and maximum dragline retrieve per crank. If you must choose between them, Delphin SHARX 6000X offers a slight edge in gear ratio, while Shimano Cardiff 301A may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 301A and Delphin SHARX?
Shimano Cardiff 301A
- With a top weight score of 9.16 out of 10 (252g / 8.89oz), this reel keeps your setup light and responsive
- A 7 out of 10 (4 A-RB + 1 RB) ball bearing gives a smooth performance across most typical fishing situations
- Solid value at €88.60, reliable and great performance, it’s a smart choice for a variety of multireels fishing needs
Delphin SHARX 6000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.8 out of 10 (5.6:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX
