Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 301A
Multireels
34.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight252g / 8.89oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size301
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/285. 0.30/235, 0.40/40 lb/yds:12/230, 14/180

Shimano Complex XR
Spinning
83.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €215.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/100
Conclusion
Shimano Complex XR 2500X clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 301A, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.3:1) and total score (8.36 out of 10). While Shimano Cardiff 301A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Complex XR 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 301A and Shimano Complex XR?
Shimano Cardiff 301A
- A 7 out of 10 (4 A-RB + 1 RB) ball bearing gives a smooth performance across most typical fishing situations
Shimano Complex XR 2500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- 6.14 out of 10 (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX
