Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 301A
Multireels
34.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight252g / 8.89oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size301
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/285. 0.30/235, 0.40/40 lb/yds:12/230, 14/180

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
65.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 DH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210
Conclusion
Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 301A, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and gear ratio (5.0:1). While Shimano Cardiff 301A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 301A and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Delphin FRIZ


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Delphin FRIZ


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX
