Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 301A
Multireels
34.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight252g / 8.89oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size301
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/285. 0.30/235, 0.40/40 lb/yds:12/230, 14/180

Shimano Vanford FA
Spinning
74.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.61 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank70 centimeter / 27.56 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €184.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2500SA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/120
Conclusion
Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 301A, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.1:1) and total score (7.49 out of 10). While Shimano Cardiff 301A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 301A and Shimano Vanford FA?
Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5 out of 10 (70 centimeter / 27.56 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X
