Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 301A
Multireels
34.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight252g / 8.89oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size301
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/285. 0.30/235, 0.40/40 lb/yds:12/230, 14/180

Shimano Catana 2500 RC
Spinning
49.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.72 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82 lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings2 Shielded Stainless Steel + 1 Roller Bearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €33.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160
Conclusion
Both Shimano Catana 2500 RC and Shimano Cardiff 301A score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score and durability. If you must choose between them, Shimano Catana 2500 RC offers a slight edge in gear ratio, while Shimano Cardiff 301A may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 301A and Shimano Catana 2500 RC?
Shimano Catana 2500 RC
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8.82 lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76cm / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Shimano Stella FK 2500X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L
