Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 401A
Multireels
48.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.24 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight337g / 11.89oz
Line retireve per crank56cm / 22.05 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €95.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size401
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm-325m / 0.35mm-270m / 0.40mm-215m 12lb-330yds / 14lb-250yds / 20lb-165yds

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT
Spinning
66.60 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.22 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €74.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 401A, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch). While Shimano Cardiff 401A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 401A and Daiwa 20 Fuego LT?
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Shimano Beastmaster
