Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 401A
Multireels
48.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.24 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight337g / 11.89oz
Line retireve per crank56cm / 22.05 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €95.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size401
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm-325m / 0.35mm-270m / 0.40mm-215m 12lb-330yds / 14lb-250yds / 20lb-165yds

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €212.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 401A, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and total score (9.5 out of 10). While Shimano Cardiff 401A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 401A and Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6 out of 10 (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX
