Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 401A
Multireels
48.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.24 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight337g / 11.89oz
Line retireve per crank56cm / 22.05 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €95.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size401
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm-325m / 0.35mm-270m / 0.40mm-215m 12lb-330yds / 14lb-250yds / 20lb-165yds

Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
84.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €229.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012QD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 401A, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and total score (8.46 out of 10). While Shimano Cardiff 401A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 401A and Daiwa 24 TDR QD?
Shimano Cardiff 401A
- A 7 out of 10 (4 A-RB + 1 RB) ball bearing gives a smooth performance across most typical fishing situations
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X
