Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Penn Battle III 3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 401A
Multireels
48.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.24 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight337g / 11.89oz
Line retireve per crank56cm / 22.05 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €95.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size401
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm-325m / 0.35mm-270m / 0.40mm-215m 12lb-330yds / 14lb-250yds / 20lb-165yds

Penn Battle III
Spinning
72.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.73 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight330g / 11.64oz
Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €96.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/180
Conclusion
Penn Battle III 3000X clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 401A, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (6,8kg / 14,99lbs) and line retrieve per crank (89 centimeter / 35.04 inch). While Shimano Cardiff 401A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Battle III 3000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 401A and Penn Battle III?
Penn Battle III 3000X
- For 8.8 out of 10 (6,8kg / 14,99lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
- 8.4 out of 10 (89 centimeter / 35.04 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Beastmaster


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX
