Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X

Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI
Spinning
52.60 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82 lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank73cm / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 SFI
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.16mm-150m / 0.18mm-120m / 0.20mm-95m

Delphin ANTIGRAVITY
Spinning
47.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.68 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight159g / 5.61oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings10+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €85.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.1/270
Conclusion
Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI clearly outshines Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (4kg / 8.82 lbs) and ball bearings (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing). While Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI and Delphin ANTIGRAVITY?
Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8.82 lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73cm / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX
