Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Catana 4000 RC

Spinning

46.10 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability2.72 out of 10

Ergonomics2 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag7kg / 15.43 lbs

Weight370g / 13.05oz

Line retireve per crank82cm / 32.28 inch

Ball bearings2 Shielded Stainless Steel + 1 Roller Bearing

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €33.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeRead drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/260. 0.30/180, 0.35/130

Penn Squall II Conventional

Multireels

55.60 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.51 out of 10

Ergonomics5.93 out of 10

Gear ratio6:1:1

Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs

Weight520g / 18.34oz

Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch

Ball bearings7

Technical Specifications

BrandPENN
The main category of the reelMultireels
Price range~ €154.10
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size25N
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeStar drag
Handle orientationRight
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Conclusion

Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX clearly outshines Shimano Catana 4000 RC, offering significantly better performance in weight (520g / 18,34oz) and ergonomics (5.93 out of 10). While Shimano Catana 4000 RC may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Shimano Catana 4000 RC and Penn Squall II Conventional?

Shimano Catana 4000 RC

The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
For 8.4 out of 10 (7kg / 15.43 lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover