Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sahara 1000 R
Spinning
36.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.94 out of 10
Ergonomics4.15 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight255g / 9.00oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €46.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/170. 0.20/140, 0.25/90

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €189.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 1000 R, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and total score (9.5 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 1000 R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 1000 R and Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Delphin HORNET 30X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X
