Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Delphin INKS 3000X

Shimano Sahara 2500 R

Spinning

38.50 out of 100

Value for money2.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability2.96 out of 10

Ergonomics4.08 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs

Weight275g / 9.70oz

Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch

Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €47.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2500
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeRead drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160

Delphin INKS

Spinning

54.70 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability2.55 out of 10

Ergonomics6.13 out of 10

Gear ratio5.1:1

Maximum drag-

Weight260g / 9.17oz

Line retireve per crank-

Ball bearings3+1

Technical Specifications

BrandDELPHIN
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €22.95
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size3000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/420

Conclusion

Delphin INKS 3000X clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 2500 R, offering significantly better performance in ergonomics (6.13 out of 10) and total score (5.47 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 2500 R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Delphin INKS 3000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 2500 R and Delphin INKS?

Shimano Sahara 2500 R

When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76cm / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles