Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X

Shimano Sahara 2500 R

Spinning

38.50 out of 100

Value for money2.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability2.96 out of 10

Ergonomics4.08 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs

Weight275g / 9.70oz

Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch

Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €47.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2500
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeRead drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160

Shimano Sedona FJ 500

Spinning

500x

60.50 out of 100

Value for money3 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability7 out of 10

Ergonomics6.43 out of 10

Gear ratio5.6:1

Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs

Weight170g / 6oz

Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch

Ball bearings4

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €52.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size500
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/110

Conclusion

Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 2500 R, offering significantly better performance in durability (7 out of 10) and ergonomics (6.43 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 2500 R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 2500 R and Shimano Sedona FJ 500?

Shimano Sahara 2500 R

When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76cm / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles

Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X

Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.