Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag

Shimano Sahara 3000S R
Spinning
38.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.99 out of 10
Ergonomics4.07 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight280g / 9.87oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160

Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
18.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.6:1
Maximum drag-
Weight630g / 22.22oz
Line retireve per crank99cm / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €25.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.35mm/370m
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sahara 3000S R and Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag score below average overall, indicating some compromises in ergonomics and durability. If you must choose between them, Shimano Sahara 3000S R offers a slight edge in ball bearings, while Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 3000S R and Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Shimano Sahara 3000S R
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.13 out of 10 (280g / 9.87oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X
