Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX

Shimano Sahara 3000S R

Spinning

38.50 out of 100

Value for money2.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability2.99 out of 10

Ergonomics4.07 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs

Weight280g / 9.87oz

Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch

Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €49.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size3000 S
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeRead drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160

Shimano FX

Spinning

48.60 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability2.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.17 out of 10

Gear ratio5.0:1

Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs

Weight250g / 8.82oz

Line retireve per crank71 centimeter / 27.95 inch

Ball bearings3

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €18.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2500 FC
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Conclusion

Both Shimano FX 2500 FCX and Shimano Sahara 3000S R score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score and durability. If you must choose between them, Shimano FX 2500 FCX offers a slight edge in maximum drag, while Shimano Sahara 3000S R may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.