Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI

Shimano Sahara 3000S R

Spinning

38.50 out of 100

Value for money2.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability2.99 out of 10

Ergonomics4.07 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs

Weight280g / 9.87oz

Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch

Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €49.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size3000 S
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeRead drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160

Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI

Spinning

63.40 out of 100

Value for money3 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability3 out of 10

Ergonomics6.18 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag4kg / 8.82 lbs

Weight245g / 8.64oz

Line retireve per crank91cm / 35.83 inch

Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €52.80
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2500 HG FI
Handle typeHandle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160 lb/yds: 6/200, 8/140, 10/120

Conclusion

Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 3000S R, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (91cm / 35.83 inch) and maximum drag (4kg / 8.82 lbs). While Shimano Sahara 3000S R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.