Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX

Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R
Spinning
29.20 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight375g / 13.23oz
Line retireve per crank82cm / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €53.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/260. 0.30/180, 0.35/130

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
82.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.62 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and total score (8.27 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.63 out of 10 (205g / 7,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Solid value at €185.33, reliable and great performance, it’s a smart choice for a variety of spinning fishing needs
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX
