Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX

Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R
Spinning
29.20 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight375g / 13.23oz
Line retireve per crank82cm / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €53.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/260. 0.30/180, 0.35/130

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
66.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and weight (265g / 9,35oz). While Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R and Shimano Twin Power FE?
Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.23 out of 10 (265g / 9,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Solid value at €399.33, reliable and great performance, it’s a smart choice for a variety of spinning fishing needs
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX
