Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag

Shimano Sahara 4000 R
Spinning
42.30 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3 kg / 6.61 lbs
Weight335g / 11.82oz
Line retireve per crank82cm / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €50.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/260. 0.30/180, 0.35/130

Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
18.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.6:1
Maximum drag-
Weight630g / 22.22oz
Line retireve per crank99cm / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €25.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.35mm/370m
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sahara 4000 R and Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag score below average overall, indicating some compromises in durability, total score and ergonomics. If you must choose between them, Shimano Sahara 4000 R offers a slight edge in maximum drag, while Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 4000 R and Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Shimano Sahara 4000 R
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3 kg / 6.61 lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Delphin ELIXIR 2000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX
