Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sahara 500 FI
Spinning
44.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.52 lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60

Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT
Feeder And Match
59.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.62 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight380g / 13.4oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €74.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 SS-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 500 FI, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (86 centimeter / 33.86 inch). While Shimano Sahara 500 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 500 FI and Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT?
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- A line retrieve score of 8.1 out of 10 86 centimeter / 33.86 inch), this reel offers quick and smooth line pickup, ideal for keeping up during active feeder sessions
Similar comparisons

Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Delphin REDIX vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX
