Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X

Shimano Sahara 500 FI
Spinning
44.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.52 lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
47.70 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X and Shimano Sahara 500 FI score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score. If you must choose between them, Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X offers a slight edge in maximum drag, while Shimano Sahara 500 FI may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 500 FI and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Shimano Sahara 500 FI
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Decent value at €62.00, it covers the basics, making it a great option for beginners or casual spinning setups
Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R
