Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX

Shimano Sahara 500 FI
Spinning
44.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.52 lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60

Shimano Stella FK
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings12+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €599.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 M HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 125/0.13
Conclusion
Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 500 FI, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs). While Shimano Sahara 500 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 500 FI and Shimano Stella FK?
Shimano Sahara 500 FI
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 8.1 out of 10 (86 centimeter / 33.86 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X
