Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX

Shimano Sahara 500 FI
Spinning
44.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.52 lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
85.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000FE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 500 FI, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and total score (8.59 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 500 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 500 FI and Shimano Twin Power FE?
Shimano Sahara 500 FI
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Daiwa BG 5000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Delphin ELIXIR 4000X vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX
