Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX

Shimano Sahara 500 FI
Spinning
44.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.52 lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60

Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG
Spinning
4000mhgx
94.90 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight270g / 9.52oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000MHG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/165
Conclusion
Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 500 FI, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and total score (9.49 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 500 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 500 FI and Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG?
Shimano Sahara 500 FI
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- A high retrieve rate of 9 out of 10 (95 centimeter / 37.4 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
Similar comparisons

Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX
