Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI
Spinning
52.60 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82 lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank73cm / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 SFI
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.16mm-150m / 0.18mm-120m / 0.20mm-95m

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.30 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX clearly outshines Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). While Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X
