Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI
Spinning
52.60 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82 lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank73cm / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 SFI
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.16mm-150m / 0.18mm-120m / 0.20mm-95m

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI and Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI offers a gear ratio of 5.0:1, while Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8.82 lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa TANASENSOR
