Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI

Spinning

52.60 out of 100

Value for money2.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability3 out of 10

Ergonomics6.18 out of 10

Gear ratio5.0:1

Maximum drag4kg / 8.82 lbs

Weight245g / 8.64oz

Line retireve per crank73cm / 28.74 inch

Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €52.80
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2500 SFI
Handle typeHandle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofil0.16mm-150m / 0.18mm-120m / 0.20mm-95m

Shimano Ocea Jigger

Multireels

90.40 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability9.5 out of 10

Ergonomics3.8 out of 10

Gear ratio5.1:1

Maximum drag18kg / 39.68lbs

Weight791g / 27.9oz

Line retireve per crank117 centimeter / 46.06 inch

Ball bearings7

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelMultireels
Price range~ €509.60
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000 HG
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeStar drag
Handle orientationRight
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.8/494

Conclusion

Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX clearly outshines Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (18kg / 39,68lbs). While Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI and Shimano Ocea Jigger?

Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI

With a score like 8.37 out of 10 (245g / 8.64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73cm / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles