Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI
Spinning
63.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82 lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank91cm / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 HG FI
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160 lb/yds: 6/200, 8/140, 10/120

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI and Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI offers a gear ratio of 6.2:1, while Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX stands out for a ball bearings of 7. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8.82 lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Similar comparisons

Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX
