Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX

Shimano Sedona 500 FI
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag3kg / 7 lbs
Weight180g / 6.3oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
83.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 SH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX clearly outshines Shimano Sedona 500 FI, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch). While Shimano Sedona 500 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona 500 FI and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Shimano Sedona 500 FI
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 7 lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX
- A high retrieve rate of 9.1 out of 10 (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Delphin ELIXIR 2000X vs Shimano Aero BB C3000X


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Delphin ELIXIR 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X
