Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X

Shimano Sedona 500 FI
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag3kg / 7 lbs
Weight180g / 6.3oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
47.70 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Shimano Sedona 500 FI clearly outshines Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.6:1) and total score (5.47 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Sedona 500 FI is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona 500 FI and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Shimano Sedona 500 FI
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.8 out of 10 (5.6:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Decent value at €52.80, it covers the basics, making it a great option for beginners or casual spinning setups
Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X
