Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X

Shimano Sedona 6000 FI
Spinning
32.80 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.6:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.04lbs
Weight425g / 14.99oz
Line retireve per crank83cm / 32.68inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 FI
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.33/240. 0.37/190, 0.405/160 lb/yds: 12/265, 16/170, 20/120

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG
Spinning
48.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.05 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight284g / 10.02oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/210
Conclusion
Both Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X and Shimano Sedona 6000 FI score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score and durability. If you must choose between them, Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X offers a slight edge in weight, while Shimano Sedona 6000 FI may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona 6000 FI and Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG?
Shimano Sedona 6000 FI
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22.04lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.86 out of 10 (83cm / 32.68inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.11 out of 10 (284g / 10,02oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Solid value at €32.95, reliable and great performance, it’s a smart choice for a variety of spinning fishing needs
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
