Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sedona 6000 FI

Spinning

32.80 out of 100

Value for money2 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability3 out of 10

Ergonomics4 out of 10

Gear ratio4.6:1

Maximum drag10kg / 22.04lbs

Weight425g / 14.99oz

Line retireve per crank83cm / 32.68inch

Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €71.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size6000 FI
Handle typeHandle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.33/240. 0.37/190, 0.405/160 lb/yds: 12/265, 16/170, 20/120

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000

Multireels

73.80 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability5.73 out of 10

Ergonomics3.8 out of 10

Gear ratio3.2:1

Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs

Weight1230g / 43.39oz

Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch

Ball bearings3

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelMultireels
Price range~ €622.90
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size-
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeStar drag
Handle orientationRight
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Conclusion

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 clearly outshines Shimano Sedona 6000 FI, offering significantly better performance in total score (7.38 out of 10) and durability (5.73 out of 10). While Shimano Sedona 6000 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.