Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX

Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
Spinning
58.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.97 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61oz
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank79cm / 31.10 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €48.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000 HGS
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.14mm-145m / 0.16mm-105m/0.18mm-80m

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI and Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI offers a gear ratio of 6.0:1, while Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI and Penn 2020 Clash II?
Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
- A fast gear ratio of 9.6 out of 10 (6.0:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7.58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.29 out of 10 (79cm / 31.10 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Delphin IXTREK 3000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Delphin IXTREK 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Delphin FRIZ


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag
