Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X

Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag
Spinning
58.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics4.03 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag2.5 kg - 5.5 lbs
Weight290 g - 10.3oz
Line retireve per crank82 cm / 32.3 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18-290 / 0,20-240 / 0,25-160 / 0,30-105 lb/yds: 6-200 / 8-140 / 10-120

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
43.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQC 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100
Conclusion
Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag clearly outshines Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (3+1) and line retrieve per crank (82 cm / 32.3 inch). While Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag and Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750?
Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 cm / 32.3 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Delphin ELIXIR 5000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Delphin ELIXIR 5000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX
