Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX

Shimano Super 4000 GT RD
Spinning
37.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag3.0 kg - 6.6 lbs
Weight355 g - 12.5oz
Line retireve per crank86 cm / 33.9 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25-260 / 0.30-180 / 0.35-130 / 0.40-100 lb/yds: 8-240 / 10-200 / 12-160

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
89.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX clearly outshines Shimano Super 4000 GT RD, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and total score (8.97 out of 10). While Shimano Super 4000 GT RD may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Super 4000 GT RD and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Delphin HORNET 30X vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Delphin FRIZ


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Delphin HORNET 30X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Delphin HORNET 30X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X
