Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tyrnos 30 II
Multireels
91.40 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1 / 2.0:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1200g / 42.33oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings4 ARB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €307.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €23.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/200
Conclusion
Shimano Tyrnos 30 II clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (15kg / 33,07lbs). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Tyrnos 30 II is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Tyrnos 30 II and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Shimano Tyrnos 30 II
- With a serious drag score of 9.2 out of 10 (15kg / 33,07lbs), this reel is made to stop big carp in their tracks, even in rough terrain or tight swims
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X
- With a score like 8.33 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74 centimeter / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X
