Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tyrnos 30 II
Multireels
91.40 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1 / 2.0:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1200g / 42.33oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings4 ARB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €307.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €204.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Tyrnos 30 II and Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Tyrnos 30 II offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 73 centimeter / 28.74 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Tyrnos 30 II and Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT?
Shimano Tyrnos 30 II
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX
