Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tyrnos 30 II
Multireels
91.40 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1 / 2.0:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1200g / 42.33oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings4 ARB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €307.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €212.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Tyrnos 30 II and Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Tyrnos 30 II offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 77 centimeter / 30.31 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Tyrnos 30 II and Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT?
Shimano Tyrnos 30 II
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6 out of 10 (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX
