Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tyrnos 30 II
Multireels
91.40 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1 / 2.0:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1200g / 42.33oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings4 ARB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €307.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
84.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €195.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Tyrnos 30 II and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Tyrnos 30 II offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 82 centimeter / 32.28 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Tyrnos 30 II and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Shimano Tyrnos 30 II
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX
