Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tyrnos 30 II
Multireels
91.40 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1 / 2.0:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1200g / 42.33oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings4 ARB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €307.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
75.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.61 out of 10
Ergonomics6.22 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4.5kg / 9,92lbs
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/220
Conclusion
Shimano Tyrnos 30 II edges out Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (4 ARB) and the maximum drag (15kg / 33,07lbs). Still, Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch and a weight of 235g / 8,29oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Tyrnos 30 II and Penn 2020 Clash II?
Shimano Tyrnos 30 II
- With premium bearings scoring 5 out of 10 (4 ARB), this reel delivers buttery smooth operation even with load
Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X
- With a score like 8.43 out of 10 (235g / 8,29oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.29 out of 10 (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX
