Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tyrnos 30 II

Multireels

91.40 out of 100

Value for money5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability9.5 out of 10

Ergonomics3.4 out of 10

Gear ratio5.0:1 / 2.0:1

Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs

Weight1200g / 42.33oz

Line retireve per crank-

Ball bearings4 ARB

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelMultireels
Price range~ €307.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size30 II
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeLever drag
Handle orientationRight
Line capacity monofil-

Shimano Sahara 4000 R

Spinning

42.30 out of 100

Value for money2.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability3 out of 10

Ergonomics2 out of 10

Gear ratio5.1:1

Maximum drag3 kg / 6.61 lbs

Weight335g / 11.82oz

Line retireve per crank82cm / 32.28 inch

Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €50.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeRead drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/260. 0.30/180, 0.35/130

Conclusion

Shimano Tyrnos 30 II clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 4000 R, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (9.14 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 4000 R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Tyrnos 30 II is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Shimano Tyrnos 30 II and Shimano Sahara 4000 R?

Shimano Tyrnos 30 II

Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.

Shimano Sahara 4000 R

6.71 out of 10 (82cm / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques