Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
Multireels
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1/1.5:1
Maximum drag19kg / 41.89 lbs
Weight1625g / 57.32oz
Line retireve per crank111/41 cm - 43.70/16.14 inch
Ball bearings4 ARB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €337.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size50 II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 50/700. 80/440

Daiwa 20 Airity LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €274.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX edges out Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) and the ball bearings (8). Still, Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10 and a maximum drag of 19kg / 41.89 lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS and Daiwa 20 Airity LT?
Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)
