Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
Multireels
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1/1.5:1
Maximum drag19kg / 41.89 lbs
Weight1625g / 57.32oz
Line retireve per crank111/41 cm - 43.70/16.14 inch
Ball bearings4 ARB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €337.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size50 II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 50/700. 80/440

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT
Spinning
72.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €72.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS and Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 93 centimeter / 36.61 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS and Daiwa 20 Fuego LT?
Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.8 out of 10 (93 centimeter / 36.61 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX
