Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)
Multireels
86.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.58:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight800g / 28219oz
Line retireve per crank55 centimeter / 21654 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €599.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/500

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €212.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) and Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX stands out for a weight of 215g / 7,58oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) and Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT?
Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6 out of 10 (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX
