Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
Multireels
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1/1.5:1
Maximum drag19kg / 41.89 lbs
Weight1625g / 57.32oz
Line retireve per crank111/41 cm - 43.70/16.14 inch
Ball bearings4 ARB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €337.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size50 II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 50/700. 80/440

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
85.50 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS offers a maximum drag of 19kg / 41.89 lbs, while Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 76 centimeter / 29.92 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX
